Michael C. Meeks v. Harold Huber, Individually, Not in His Official Capacity

50 F.3d 15 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael C. MEEKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Harold HUBER, individually, not in his official capacity, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55609. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 7, 1995. * Decided March 9, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael C. Meeks appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action for failure to prosecute. The district court dismissed Meeks's action pursuant to Local Rule 41-1 because he failed to perfect service of an amended complaint following remand from this court. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we vacate and remand. 3 On October 1, 1991, Meeks filed this action in the Southern District of California and requested in forma pauperis status. The district court granted Meeks's request to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed his action sua sponte because it did…