Kim Reuter v. Bob Skipper

50 F.3d 16 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kim REUTER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bob SKIPPER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-35901. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 6, 1995. * Decided March 9, 1995. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court, for the District of Oregon, D.C. No. CV-92-01622-JAR; James A. Redden, District Judge, Presiding. 2 Before: HALL, O'SCANNLAIN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges 3 MEMORANDUM ** 4 Skipper appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment and entry of a permanent injunction in favor of Reuter. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 5 Reuter sued Skipper seeking damages, declaratory judgment, and a permanent injunction. After the district court granted summary judgment in favor of Reuter, but before the scope of the permanent injunction had been decided, Skipper filed a notice of appeal. Skipper failed to file another notice of appeal after the district court entered the permanent…