United States v. Richard Allen Bellon

50 F.3d 16 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Allen BELLON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10271. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 7, 1995. * Decided March 13, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard Allen Bellon appeals pro se his conviction for assaulting two federal officers, forcibly interfering with a federal officer's administration of tax laws, and forcibly rescuing seized property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 The pretrial bail issue is moot. United States v. Halliburton, 870 F.2d 557, 562 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 910 (1989). 4 We reject as frivolous Bellon's argument that the district court lacked jurisdiction over these federal crimes. See United States v. Studley, 783 F.2d 934, 937 (9th Cir.1986); United States v. Pryzbyla, 737 F.2d 828, 829 (9th Cir.1984) (per curiam), cert.…