Refugio Reyes-Martinez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

50 F.3d 16 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Refugio REYES-MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70520. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 7, 1995. * Decided March 13, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Refugio Reyes-Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") decision affirming the immigration judge's ("IJ") denial of his application for discretionary relief from deportation under section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182 (c). 3 In his petition to this court, Reyes-Martinez contends that the BIA erred by finding that he failed to demonstrate "outstanding and unusual" equities. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a), and we deny the petition for review. 4 * Background 5 Reyes-Martinez was admitted to the United States as…