United States v. Behzad Behnia, United States of America v. Behrouz Behnia

50 F.3d 16 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Behzad BEHNIA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Behrouz BEHNIA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-10199, 94-10218. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 14, 1995. Decided March 15, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, PREGERSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Behrouz and Behzad Behnia appeal their convictions for drug offenses under 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 (a)(1) and 846. The Behnias argue that the district court erred in refusing to suppress evidence of the marijuana growing operation at their place of business and at their residences. Behrouz Behnia also asserts that the district court erred in refusing his request for a minor role reduction under U.S.S.G. Sec. 3B1.2. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and affirm. 3 * We review a district court's Franks hearing determination that false…