Tulare County Audubon Soc. v. Espy

50 F.3d 16 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. TULARE COUNTY AUDUBON SOCIETY; Scenic Shoreline Preservation Conference, Inc., California nonprofit corporations, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mike ESPY, Secretary; F. Dale Robertson; Ronald E. Stewart; Sandra Key, Defendants-Appellees, Sierra Forest Products, a California corporation, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee. No. 93-17142. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 12, 1994. Decided March 1, 1995. 1 Before: POOLE and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and MARQUEZ, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Tulare County Audubon Society and Scenic Shoreline Preservation Conference (collectively "TCAS") appeal from the district court's denial of their motion for a preliminary injunction. Appellants have sued the National Forest Service, alleging that the Service violated the National Forest Management Act ("NFMA") and National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA") by failing to adequately consider past…