Janice Carole Sendelbach v. Motorola, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

50 F.3d 16 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Janice Carole SENDELBACH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOTOROLA, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-16344. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 16, 1994. Decided March 23, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, PREGERSON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Janice Sendelbach appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Motorola, Inc., her former employer. In this diversity action, Sendelbach alleges wrongful discharge and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Sendelbach also seeks attorney's fees and costs on appeal. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1332 and we have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm the judgment of the district court. 3 * Sendelbach was employed by Motorola from 1984 to September 1988. Sometime in July 1987, she suffered an on-the-job injury…