United States v. Pamela Sue Branson

Good Law
50 F.3d 16·1995 WL 128040·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19037
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 23, 199594-10410California1,036 words

Opinion

Opinion

50 F.3d 16 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pamela Sue BRANSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10410. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 21, 1995. * Decided March 23, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Pamela Branson appeals the 18-month sentence imposed following the revocation of her probation. We review de novo the application of the Sentencing Guidelines upon revocation of probation. United States v. Lockard, 910 F.2d 542, 543 (9th Cir.1990). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 Branson was serving a 60-month term of probation when probation officers searched her apartment. Branson's 22-year-old son, Cory, shared the two-bedroom apartment. The officers found four firearms under Cory's bed. They also found two firearms in Branson's storage locker. The locker was located a few blocks from the apartment, Branson paid the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.