United States v. Michael Charles Griggs

50 F.3d 17 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Charles GRIGGS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-30277. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 2, 1994. Decided Jan. 4, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Eastern District of Washington, D.C. No. CR-92-0201-AAM; Alan A. McDonald, District Judge, Presiding. E.D.Wash. [WITHDRAWING AND SUPERSEDING 33 F.3d 60 ] MOTION GRANTED. Before: ALARCON, BEEZER, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The motion of appellant Michael Charles Griggs made by and through Vito de la Cruz, his attorney, requesting us to vacate and reissue the memorandum decision is granted. The memorandum disposition filed August 15, 1994 is withdrawn and the mandate issued herein is recalled. 2 The memorandum disposition is ordered refiled as of the date of this order and thereafter the mandate shall issue forthwith. 3 Petitions to vacate and…