Valentin Vizcarra-Coronel v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

50 F.3d 18 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Valentin VIZCARRA-CORONEL, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70324. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 21, 1995. * Decided March 23, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Valentin Vizcarra-Coronel petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) order affirming the Immigration Judge's (IJ) order of deportation. Vizcarra-Coronel alleges that the deportation proceedings violated due process. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a) and we deny the petition. 3 The due process clause applies to deportation proceedings. Baires v. INS, 856 F.2d 89, 90-91 (9th Cir.1988). 4 Vizcarra-Coronel first argues that the IJ violated his right to due process by denying his motion for a continuance. 5 On December 15, 1993, Vizcarra-Coronel entered a guilty plea to possession of cocaine in state court. On…