Louis Williams v. City and County of San Francisco San Francisco Department of Parking and Traffic Control San Francisco Municipal Court

50 F.3d 18 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Louis WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; San Francisco Department of Parking and Traffic Control; San Francisco Municipal Court, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15685. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 7, 1995. * Decided March 13, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Louis Williams appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in his action brought under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 and 1985. On appeal, Williams contends that: (1) the City and County of San Francisco's ("City") Notice of Delinquent Parking Violation must be on the form approved by the Judicial Council; (2) California Vehicle Code Sec. 4760 is unconstitutional; and (3) the City's vehicle tow hearings are unconstitutional because the tow officer's presence is not required. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and…