United States v. Daniel E. Thomson, United States of America v. Daniel E. Thomson

50 F.3d 18 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel E. THOMSON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel E. THOMSON, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-30083, 94-30085. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 7, 1995. * Decided March 13, 1995. Before: HALL, O'SCANNLAIN, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Daniel E. Thomson and his wife pleaded guilty in an earlier proceeding to maintaining an establishment for the distribution and use of a controlled substance. Judge Michael Hogan, who presided over the drug case, ordered Thomson released pending sentencing. Thomson, however, failed to appear with his wife at the sentencing hearing. On the date of the hearing, Thomson telephoned his attorney and his wife's attorney and, upset over the sentence imposed on his wife, made serious threats against the life of Judge Hogan and Judge Hogan's wife and…