United States v. Jesus Blanco Teran

Good Law
50 F.3d 18·1995 WL 115569·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18947
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 16, 199594-10255California957 words

Opinion

Opinion

50 F.3d 18 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus Blanco TERAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10255. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 14, 1995. Decided March 16, 1995. IN PART, REVERSED IN PART. Before: FLETCHER, PREGERSON and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Jesus Teran appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines following his guilty plea to bribery of a public official, 18 U.S.C. Secs. 201 (b)(2)(A) and (b)(4). Having jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for resentencing. 3 The district court's interpretation and application of the sentencing guidelines are reviewed de novo. United States v. Navarro, 979 F.2d 786, 788 (9th Cir.1992). The court's findings of fact are reviewed for clear error. United States v. Turner, 898 F.2d 705, 708 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 962 (1990). 4 * Teran pleaded…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.