Brenda Walker v. City of San Bernardino Frank Alvarez Todd Haumann Dana Bee

50 F.3d 18 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Brenda WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO; Frank Alvarez; Todd Haumann; Dana Bee, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-56273. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 21, 1994. * Decided March 7, 1995. Before: CHOY, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Brenda Walker ("Walker") appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of San Bernardino ("City") and San Bernardino police officers in Walker's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. Walker contends that the district court erred by granting summary judgment on her claims that the police officers used excessive force and failed to provide her with adequate medical care when they arrested her. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , we affirm the district court's decision. 3 * In August 1990, Walker was convicted of incitement to riot, two counts of resisting arrest,…