Mark S. Wilson v. Carmen Danny Clem Christian C. Casad Irene Kiyoko Asai Gayle Wakefield

50 F.3d 19 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark S. WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Carmen Danny CLEM; Christian C. Casad; Irene Kiyoko Asai; Gayle Wakefield, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35272. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 7, 1995. * Decided March 13, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mark S. Wilson, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his civil rights suit brought under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 and 1985(2). In his complaint, Wilson alleged that: (1) defendants Clem, Casad, and Asai, district attorneys, improperly joined charges against him, introduced false evidence against him at his criminal trial in 1990, elicited perjured testimony, failed to correct perjured testimony, and introduced perjured statements of their own; (2) defendant Wakefield, a court reporter, deliberately falsified Wilson's trial transcript; and (3) defendants Clem, Casad,…