Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International Union Welfare Fund v. Gentner

Good Law
50 F.3d 719·95 Daily Journal DAR 3539·19 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1001·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5538·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2054
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 199593-15684California2,494 words

Opinion

Opinion

50 F.3d 719 63 USLW 2602 , 19 Employee Benefits Cas. 1001 , Pens. Plan Guide P 23906X HOTEL EMPLOYEES & RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION WELFARE FUND, a multiemployer employee benefit fund; Edward T. Hanley; Patrick J. Kane, as Trustees, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Virgil GENTNER; Virgil R. Gentner, Chartered, a Professional Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15684. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 17, 1994 * . Decided March 21, 1995. Diana L.S. Peters, Feder & Associates, Washington, DC, for plaintiffs-appellants. James R. Olson, Rawlings, Olson & Cannon, Las Vegas, NV, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. Before: LAY, ** PREGERSON, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. LAY, Circuit Judge: 1 The Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees International Union Welfare Fund, et al. ("the Fund") appeal the district court's dismissal of their claims against Virgil R. Gentner, an attorney representing Joseph K. Newell, a Fund beneficiary. BACKGROUND 2 On April 2, 1987, a car struck and severely injured Newell. At the time, Newell was a participant in Plan Unit 150 of the Fund,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.