Lincoln Lane Addleman, Jr. v. Janet Barbour, Superintendent Kathryn S. Bail

51 F.3d 279 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lincoln Lane ADDLEMAN, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Janet BARBOUR, Superintendent; KATHRYN S. BAIL, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-35919. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 21, 1995. * Decided March 23, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lincoln Lane Addleman, Jr., a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 petition. Addleman pleaded guilty to statutory rape in the first degree and, on June 9, 1980, was sentenced to life imprisonment. Addleman contends the district court erred when it dismissed some of his claims as abusive, others as procedurally barred, and the remainder as meritless. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 , and we affirm. 3 We accept the district court's factual findings unless clearly erroneous and review its conclusions of law de novo. Jones v. Meyer,…