Charles Emmett v. Lawry's Restaurants, Inc. David E. Stockman

51 F.3d 279 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles EMMETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAWRY'S RESTAURANTS, INC.; David E. Stockman, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-56262. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 9, 1995. Decided March 31, 1995. Before: BROWNING, BOOCHEVER and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Charles Emmett appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of some of his claims, and grant of summary judgment regarding the remainder of his claims against Lawry's Restaurants, Inc. ("Lawry's") and David Stockman, Lawry's vice-president of operations, for racial discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Secs. 2000e to 2000e-17, wrongful discharge, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. 3 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . Because we conclude that all claims in Emmett's…