Alan Lee Brandt v. Del Ray Holm Daniel Sharp Olivia Craven Ida Leggett Pete Rodriquez Frank Chidichima Sondra Johnson

51 F.3d 279 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alan Lee BRANDT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Del Ray HOLM; Daniel Sharp; Olivia Craven; Ida Leggett; Pete Rodriquez; Frank Chidichima; Sondra Johnson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35792. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 21, 1995. * Decided April 4, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alan Lee Brandt, an Idaho state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and affirm. 3 Brandt's complaint alleged that members of the Idaho Parole Commission violated his constitutional rights by giving him one parole date during a parole hearing, and then unilaterally altering his parole date one month prior to Brandt's scheduled release. The district court concluded that Brandt's claims were barred on res judicata grounds by his previous state habeas proceeding raising…