In re Lee

51 F.3d 280 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Elizabeth Noble LEE, Debtor, Elizabeth Noble LEE, aka Elizabeth L. Shevchek, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Franklin K. LANE, III; Providencia Limited; and Amalgamated Steel and Foundry Corporation, Defendants-Appellants. No. 93-56227. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 21, 1995. * Decided April 5, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Attorney Franklin K. Lane III appeals pro se the district court's affirmance of the bankruptcy court's denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from the bankruptcy court's default judgment entered in favor of debtor Elizabeth Noble Lee. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 158 (d), and we affirm. 1 3 Lane contends that the default judgment against him should be set aside pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(1) because severe depression prevented him from properly defending his case. 4 We review for abuse…