Louis Hutchison Gayle Reese Rhr, Inc. v. Kfc Corporation

51 F.3d 280 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Louis HUTCHISON; Gayle Reese; RHR, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KFC CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-16847. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 15, 1995. Decided March 28, 1995. Before: NORRIS, WIGGINS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * OVERVIEW 2 Plaintiffs-appellants Louis Hutchison, Gayle Reese, and RHR, Inc. (collectively, "Hutchison") appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp. ("KFC"). Hutchison brought the action under Nevada's version of the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Nev.Rev.Stat. Secs. 600A.030, et seq. in the District Court for the District of Nevada pursuant to that court's diversity jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1332 (a)(1). We affirm the order of summary judgment for KFC because the material that Hutchison disclosed to KFC in confidence did not constitute a protectible…