Murray E. Fields v. Elizabeth MacEo Richard Rogers Lee Fischler Robert McCannally Claudia Holband

51 F.3d 280 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Murray E. FIELDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Elizabeth MACEO; Richard Rogers; Lee Fischler; Robert McCannally; Claudia Holband, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15646. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 17, 1995. * Decided March 28, 1995. Before: HUG, FARRIS, and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Murray Fields, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for Elizabeth Maceo, Richard Rogers, Robert McCannally, Claudia Holband and Lee Fischler in his civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 , 1985. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment, Jesinger v. Nevada Federal Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994), and we affirm. 3 * Fields argues that the district court erred by granting summary judgment for Probation Officers Maceo, Rogers, McCannally and Holband…