Marjorie A. Groce v. C. Armando De Leon, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a Judge of the Arizona Superior Court

51 F.3d 280 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Marjorie A. GROCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. C. Armando DE LEON, individually and in his official capacity as a Judge of the Arizona Superior Court, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-15843. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 21, 1995. * Decided April 4, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Marjorie A. Groce appeals pro se the district court's sua sponte dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d). Groce alleged that C. Armando de Leon, an Arizona superior court judge, violated Groce's due process and equal protection rights under the Fourteenth Amendment by prohibiting an assistant from sitting next to Groce during her trial. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Groce contends that the district court erred by dismissing her action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915 (d) because…