Robert Fadem Mary O. Fadem v. United States of America, Robert Fadem Mary O. Fadem v. United States

Good Law
51 F.3d 280
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 199592-56400California589 words

Opinion

Opinion

51 F.3d 280 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert FADEM; Mary O. Fadem, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. Robert FADEM; Mary O. Fadem, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 92-56400, 92-56407. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 10, 1994. * Memorandum Filed June 22, 1994. Memorandum Withdrawn Oct. 20, 1994. Decided March 29, 1995. Before: BRIGHT ** , WIGGINS and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 The parties are familiar with the facts so we need not restate them here. Appellants' request to submit additional briefing is DENIED. 3 A. Fadem v. United States (No. 92-56407) (Fadem III ). 4 This case was filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), essentially alleging negligent resurvey of the land. In Fadem v. United States, 791 F.2d 1381 (9th Cir.1986) (Fadem II ), this court held that the exclusive vehicle for challenging the United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.