Richard Habeeb v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company Tyler Cartwright

51 F.3d 280 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard HABEEB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY; Tyler Cartwright, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16072. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 15, 1995. Decided March 29, 1995. Before: REINHARDT, THOMPSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * OVERVIEW 2 Richard Habeeb, a resident of California, appeals the district court's order dismissing his first amended complaint against State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm), an Illinois corporation, and Tyler Cartwright, a State Farm employee and California domiciliary. 1 He argues the district court improperly exercised diversity jurisdiction over this case. He also contends the court erred in finding his causes of action for bad faith and intentional infliction of emotional distress were time-barred, and in not granting him leave to amend his complaint. 3 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28…