Robert Andrew Leslie v. City Prosecutor of Long Beach Long Beach Police Department

Good Law
51 F.3d 280·1995 WL 139363·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23686
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 30, 199594-55201California1,111 words

Opinion

Opinion

51 F.3d 280 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert Andrew LESLIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY PROSECUTOR OF LONG BEACH; Long Beach Police Department, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55201. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 13, 1994. * Decided March 30, 1995. Before: CHOY, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Leslie ("Leslie"), a former state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action seeking a reversal of his state court conviction. Leslie contends that the district court erred by concluding that his claim was time-barred. 3 * Leslie was convicted in California state court in September, 1986 for prescribing controlled substances without medical need and criminal excessive prescribing. After his conviction, Leslie filed several habeas corpus petitions with the California Supreme Court seeking a reversal of his conviction. Apparently, all of these…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.