Gary Hobson Edward F. Wills Kenneth Lee Krause v. George Sumner

51 F.3d 280 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gary HOBSON; Edward F. Wills; Kenneth Lee Krause, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. George SUMNER, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-17230. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 21, 1995. * Decided March 27, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Plaintiffs Gary Hobson, Edward Wills, and Kenneth Krause appeal pro se the district court's summary judgment against them on their civil RICO claims, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1961 et seq. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * We review de novo a grant of summary judgment, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom it was granted. Jesinger v. Nevada Fed. Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994). Summary judgment is proper if "there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c).…