Duane Everett McMican v. Samuel A. Lewis, and David Gonzalez, Art Rubin Cso Watkins and Lt. Basurto

Good Law
51 F.3d 281·1995 WL 107167·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23722
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 199594-16558California703 words

Opinion

Opinion

51 F.3d 281 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Duane Everett McMICAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel A. LEWIS, Defendant, and David GONZALEZ, Art Rubin; CSO Watkins; and Lt. Basurto, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16558. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 7, 1995. * Decided March 10, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Duane Everett McMican, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in McMican's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. In his complaint, McMican alleged that a prison guard had violated his civil rights by touching his groin and buttocks area during a routine pat-down search and that the guard and other prison officials conspired to cover-up the incident. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment. Hopkins v. Andaya, 958 F.2d 881, 884…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.