Mendez v. Gomez

51 F.3d 281 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jose MENDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ, L. Jones, Warden of North Kern State Prison; R--Program Administrator; Sergeant McEwen; J--Brown, Officer; J--Brown Officer; G--Officer; Big CDC Correctional Officer; D--Chief Medical Officer and MR--Medical Trained Assistant, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16205. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 21, 1995. * Decided April 5, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Eastern District of California, D.C. No. CV-94-05469-OWW; Oliver W. Wanger, District Judge, Presiding. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jose Mendez, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action on grounds that his complaint failed to contain a short and plain statement of his claims, as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2). We dismiss Mendez's…