United States v. Shawn Michael Danielson
Opinion
Opinion
51 F.3d 282 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shawn Michael DANIELSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30311. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 7, 1995. * Decided March 10, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, D.C. No. CR-94-00034-FVS; Fred L. Van Sickle, District Judge, Presiding. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Shawn Michael Danielson appeals his 57-month sentence imposed following a guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922 (g). Danielson contends that the district court sentenced him based upon unreliable hearsay and miscalculated his criminal history. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and dismiss. 3 A defendant may waive the right to appeal in a plea agreement. United States v. Bolinger, 940 F.2d 478, 480 (9th Cir.1991). 4…