Moshe Perelman v. American Bankers Insurance Company, Defendant-Apellee

51 F.3d 282 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Moshe PERELMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY, et al, Defendant-Apellee. No. 94-16053. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 3, 1995. * Decided March 30, 1995. Before: CHOY, SNEED, and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Moshe Perelman ("Perelman") appeals pro se the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his (1) 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights claim, (2) 29 U.S.C. Sec. 794 ("Rehabilitation Act") claim, and (3) various state law claims against American Bankers Insurance Co. ("American") and unnamed others. 3 * On April 29, 1993, Perelman suffered flood damage to his home from a leaking dishwasher. He reported this loss to American, his insurance company, and filed a claim for damages to the interior of his home and certain personal property items. On or about June 20, 1993, Perelman sustained an eye injury and was hospitalized because the…