United States v. Ramon Ayala-Zepeda, Victor Lomeli-Rodriguez, Vicente Fernandez-Flores, Luis Garcia-Flores

51 F.3d 282 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramon AYALA-ZEPEDA, Victor Lomeli-Rodriguez, Vicente Fernandez-Flores, Luis Garcia-Flores, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 94-50452, 94-50472, 94-50454, 94-50470. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 10, 1995. Decided March 29, 1995. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Ramon Ayala-Zepeda, Victor Lomeli-Rodriguez, Vicente Fernandez-Flores and Luis Garcia-Flores appeal their convictions by conditional guilty pleas to possession of false identification documents in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1028 (a)(3). The appellants argue that the district court erred by denying their joint motion to suppress evidence obtained through a defective search warrant. Because we find that the district court did not err in applying the "good faith" exception articulated in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897…