Luis Mesa Roche v. Barry Allen

51 F.3d 282 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Luis Mesa ROCHE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barry ALLEN, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16659. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 21, 1995. * Decided March 29, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Luis Mesa Roche, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction of his civil rights action alleging that the Arizona Department of Public Safety and three individual officers violated his fourth amendment rights in connection with the stop and search of his vehicle. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 The district court properly found that it lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendants. See Data Disc, Inc. v. Systems Technology Assoc., Inc., 557 F.2d 1280, 1287 (9th Cir.1977). The defendants have no contact with the State of Nevada. All of the defendants reside…