United States v. Amparo Madriz

51 F.3d 283 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Amparo MADRIZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-35276. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 10, 1995. * Decided March 24, 1995. 1 Before: WRIGHT, HALL, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** FACTS 3 Amparo Madriz was convicted by a jury of conspiracy and substantive offenses related to the trafficking of cocaine and heroin. She appealed to this court, which remanded for a new trial on three counts and for resentencing on the remaining counts. The three counts remanded for a new trial were subsequently dismissed. The district court, following a resentencing hearing on the remaining three counts, imposed the same sentence as it had previously: 425 months imprisonment, a fine of $100,000, and a 5-year term of supervised release. Madriz filed a notice of appeal, but then failed to perfect that appeal. It was subsequently dismissed on September…