Steven Michael Wronko v. United States

Good Law
51 F.3d 284·1995 WL 138625·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23591
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 27, 199594-16331California420 words

Opinion

Opinion

51 F.3d 284 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Steven Michael WRONKO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-16331. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 21, 1995. * Decided March 27, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Steven Michael Wronko, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate or set aside his sentence for a 1991 conspiracy and firearm charges. We previously affirmed Wronko's conviction and sentence after resentencing on direct appeals in unpublished memorandum dispositions. For the first time in his Sec. 2255 motion, Wronko contends that his due process rights were violated at jury trial because: (1) the Government used perjured testimony; (2) insufficient evidence supported his conviction for the firearm charge under a theory of coconspirator liability; and (3) the trial court failed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.