Fernando Zuniga-Lopez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

51 F.3d 284 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Fernando ZUNIGA-LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70482. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 21, 1995. * Decided March 29, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Fernando Zuniga-Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' dismissal of his appeal from an immigration judge's decision denying his application for voluntary departure. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105 (a), and we affirm. 3 Zuniga-Lopez contends that the immigration judge erred in denying his request for voluntary departure because the judge failed to consider the following equities in his favor: he works cleaning houses, gardening and landscaping; he gives $150 per week to his common-law wife and the mother of his three children; and three of his five brothers are lawful permanent…