Byron S. Woolley v. Dr. B. Textor

51 F.3d 284 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Byron S. WOOLLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. B. TEXTOR; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16065. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 21, 1995. * Decided April 4, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Eastern District of California, D.C. No. CV-88-01455-GGH; Gregory G. Hollows, Magistrate Judge, Presiding. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Byron S. Woolley appeals pro se a directed verdict in favor of the defendants. In his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 complaint, Woolley alleged that the defendant prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs when they did not supply him with hearing aids. Woolley contends he proffered evidence demonstrating defendants' liability. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we dismiss the appeal for Woolley's failure to comply with…