Jay E. Wallace v. City and County of San Francisco

51 F.3d 284 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jay E. WALLACE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-15618. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 21, 1995. * Decided March 27, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jay E. Wallace appeals the district court's summary judgment in favor of the City and County of San Francisco on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 claim for denial of procedural due process. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment, Jesinger v. Nevada Fed. Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994), and we affirm. 3 Wallace contends that San Francisco violated his due process rights when it denied him reappointment to the San Francisco Police Department without providing notice of reasons or a hearing. Wallace sought reappointment one year after resigning from the…