United States v. Michael L. Williams

Good Law
51 F.3d 284·1995 WL 107175·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23595
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 10, 199594-30262California483 words

Opinion

Opinion

51 F.3d 284 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael L. WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-30262. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 7, 1995. * Decided March 10, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael L. Williams appeals his conviction and the 118-month sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to armed bank robbery and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 2113 (a), (d), and 924(c). Williams claims the district court erred by increasing his base offense level for restraining a victim pursuant to U.S.S.G. Sec. 2B3.1(b)(4)(B). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Williams contends the district court should not have enhanced his sentence because he did not "physically restrain" a teller within the meaning of U.S.S.G. Sec. 1B1.1. We disagree. 4…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.