Steinbach v. Hubbard

Good Law
51 F.3d 843·95 Daily Journal DAR 4149·2 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1089·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6612·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2398
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 3, 199592-36961California2,678 words

Opinion

Opinion

51 F.3d 843 63 USLW 2650 , 129 Lab.Cas. P 33,216 , 2 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1089 Justin STEINBACH; Gary Yurina; Robert Wattez; Elizabeth Blasdell; Scott Farlow; David Williams; Leslie Bannerman; Cheryl Bowman; Randy Vanderheiden; Janet Evans; Debbie Talley; Daylon Sweeney, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Steven HUBBARD, and the marital community of Steven and Sheila Hubbard d/b/a Hubbard Ambulance Services; Sheila Hubbard, d/b/a Hubbard Ambulance Services; Hubbard Ambulance Services, a Washington corporation, Defendants, and Care Ambulance Service, a Washington corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-36961. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 7, 1994. Decided April 3, 1995. Steven B. Frank, Martin Garfinkel, Frank & Rosen, Seattle, WA, for plaintiffs-appellants. Thomas W. Sondag, Lane, Powell, Spears, Lubersky, Seattle, WA, for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. POOLE, Circuit Judge: 1 We are faced with a question of first impression: does successorship liability exist under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. Sec. 201 et seq.? We conclude that it does, but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.