Chenery

Chenery v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp.

Good Law
4 F.2d 826·1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3101
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 6, 1925No. 4449California1,028 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Rudkin, J.

This was an action by an administrator with the will annexed on a policy of insurance providing indemnity for the loss of life or injuries resulting through accidental means. At the close of the testimony on the part of the plaintiff, the court below directed a verdict in favor of the defendant; hence the present writ of error.

The sole question for our consideration is this: Did the intestate meet her death while a passenger in or on a public conveyance provided by a common carrier for passenger service? There was no controversy over the facts. For about five years prior to the date in question Roberts & Ward operated a motor bus line between the towns of Clevedon and Papakura, in New Zealand, for the transportation of passengers and light parcels for hire. The distance between the 'two points is about 8 miles and the busses made three trips daily, leaving Clevedon at 7 a. in., 8:30 a. m., and 3:30 p. m. The regular passenger fare was three shillings, single; six shillings, return. In addition to operating the bus line between the points in question, Roberts & Ward transported passengers to and from points beyond Clevedon by special arrangement. By special arrangement we mean…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.