John Witherow v. Marvin Paff

Good Law
52 F.3d 264·95 Daily Journal DAR 4612·1995 WL 170449·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 8068·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2664
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 199593-17068California814 words

Opinion

Opinion

John Witherow,. an inmate in the Nevada State prison system, filed this complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . He alleges that defendants violated his constitutional rights by refusing to allow him to send mail to the Nevada Attorney General without a “cursory visual inspection” of the contents of the envelope in order to check for offensive or dangerous materials. The defendants are various prison officials who promulgated, administer, and enforce the regulation pursuant to which the inspections are made. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants. Witherow appeals. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Appellant, as a prison inmate, enjoys a First Amendment right to send and receive mail. See Thornburgh v. Abbott, 490 U.S. 401, 407 , 109 S.Ct. 1874, 1878-79 , 104 L.Ed.2d 459 (1989). However, a prison may adopt regulations which impinge on an inmate’s constitutional rights if those regulations are “reasonably related to legitimate penological interests.” Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89 , 107 S.Ct. 2254, 2261 , 96 L.Ed.2d 64 (1987). Legitimate penological interests include “security, order, and rehabilitation.” Procunier v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.