United States v. Paul Bradley Wood

Good Law
52 F.3d 272·95 Daily Journal DAR 4807·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 8718·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2746
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 17, 199517-16380California2,359 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hall, J.

In a case of first impression in this circuit, we hold that the offense of indecent liberties with a minor, in violation of Washington state law, is a crime of violence for purposes of the career offender provisions of the Sentencing Guidelines. U.S.S.G. §§ 4B1.1, 4B1.2 (Nov. 1993).

. BACKGROUND

Paul Bradley Wood pleaded guilty in the district court to a single count of mailing a threatening communication, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 876 . The conduct underlying that offense involved Wood’s mailing a letter to a female Public Defender who had represented Wood in a civil commitment proceeding the previous year. In the letter, Wood threatened, in graphic detail, to violently rape and kill the Public Defender. He also made two threatening telephone calls to the victim, but was not charged with additional § 876 counts for that conduct, pursuant to a plea agreement. Wood appeals only his sentence.

Wood apparently has a long history of sex offenses and violent crimes. According to his mother, Wood raped his half-brother early in the 1980s, when the brother was about five years old. While authorities have been unable to confirm his claims, Wood admits to having molested at least…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.