Morlen

Morlen v. United States

Good Law
13 F.2d 625·1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3637
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 14, 1926No. 4797California218 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hunt, J.

Morlen was in-dieted and convicted under an indictment charging (count 1) that in June, 1925, he feloniously sold and distributed morphine not in the original package ( 38 Stat. 789 , § 8 [Comp. St. § 6287n]) and (count 2) that he fraudulently received, concealed, bought, sold, and facilitated the transportation and con- ' cealment after importation, of certain morphine which he then and there well knew had been imported into the United States contrary to law ( 42 Stat. 596 [Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 8800 et seq.]).

The principal questions pertain to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction under count 2 and to the instructions of the court. The evidence showed that Morlen had possession of the narcotic drug described; that he passed a package containing the morphine to an informer; that on the night of his arrest he told the officials that all he had obtained was just a little “to get by, to make his own stuff out of it,” and that that was the last he had; that there were no revenue stamps on the package of morphine taken from the defendant; that after the trans *626 action, in resisting arrest, he dropped some marked money that had been passed to him by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.