In re De Bock

Good Law
14 F.2d 675·1925 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1514
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 1925Nos. 1263, 1264California502 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

These matters rise out of an action for alienation of affections, in which Catherine M. Johnston, here an objecting creditor, obtained a judgment for $5,000 against the present bankrupts. Said Catherine M. Johnston also is purchaser of certain real property which was sold to her on execution sale to satisfy the judgment thus obtained. She also is holder of an unsatisfied judgment against the bankrupts, rendered in an action brought by her for the unlawful detainer of said property after its purchase by her. From the second judgment bankrupts have prosecuted an appeal to the Supreme Court of California, and said appeal is now pending. 244 P. 330 .

Applications for discharges in bankruptcy have been duly made to this court, and the statutory period for proof of claims has elapsed. Various debts were listed in the schedules filed, but a single claim alone has been presented to the referee in each ease; one based on the judgment in unlawful detainer.

The objecting creditor now asserts that there is no jurisdiction to grant a discharge, and moves that the proceedings be dismissed, alleging that said claim is nondischargeable; and, if dischargeable, nevertheless nonprovable.

The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.