Charles E. Fingers v. McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company McDonnell Douglas Corporation
Opinion
Opinion
52 F.3d 332 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles E. FINGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MCDONNELL DOUGLAS HELICOPTER COMPANY; MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-55819. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 4, 1995. * Decided April 6, 1995. Before: NOONAN, O'SCANNLAIN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Charles Fingers brought numerous claims against his employer, McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company ("MDHC"), and its owner, McDonnell Douglas Corporation ("MDC"), alleging discrimination, retaliation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. We affirm. 3 * Fingers was employed by MDHC as a turret lathe machinist from May 7, 1984 to November 22, 1991. Fingers filed numerous grievances while he worked for MDHC, often alleging racial discrimination. In August 1990, Mike Herle became Fingers' immediate supervisor. Herle and Fingers…