Dennis Paul Eddy v. Samuel Lewis Grant Woods, Attorney General

52 F.3d 332 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dennis Paul EDDY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Samuel LEWIS; Grant Woods, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees. No. 94-16315. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 4, 1995. * Decided April 7, 1995. Before: BROWNING, SNEED, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona state prisoner Dennis Paul Eddy appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his habeas corpus petition brought under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 . Eddy contends that the district court erred by failing to find that his punishment was "invalidated" because prison officials subjected Eddy to physical assault and other abuse, and by denying his requests for discovery. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Secs. 1291 , 2253, and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the denial of a writ of habeas corpus, Admas v. Peterson, 968 F.2d 835, 843 (9th Cir.1992) (en banc), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 1818 (1993), and factual findings for…