Amwest Sur. Ins. Co. v. Reno

Good Law
52 F.3d 332·1995 WL 230357·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18731
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 18, 199593-56625California680 words

Opinion

Opinion

52 F.3d 332 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. AMWEST SURETY INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation; Far West Insurance Company, a California corporation; Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds and Insurance Agency, a California General Partnership Plaintiffs/Counterdefendants/Appellants, v. Janet RENO, Attorney General, United States Department of Justice; Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Department of Justice; Mryta K. Sales, acting Commissioner Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Department of Justice; District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Department Justice; United States of America, Defendants/Counterclaimants/Appellees. No. 93-56625. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 6, 1995. Decided April 18, 1995. 1 Before: D.W. NELSON and CANBY, Circuit Judges, and TANNER, District Judge * . 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Amwest Surety Insurance, Far West Insurance, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.