Antun Damjanovic Milgros Damjanovic and Klara Damjanovic v. County of Los Angeles Sherman Block, Sheriff of Los Angeles County, and Robert C. Ambrose

52 F.3d 332 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Antun DAMJANOVIC; Milgros Damjanovic; and Klara Damjanovic, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; Sherman Block, Sheriff of Los Angeles County, Defendants-Appellees, and Robert C. Ambrose, et al., Defendants. No. 93-56223. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 6, 1995. Decided April 5, 1995. 1 Before: SCHROEDER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and KING, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 The Damjanovics appeal the district court's summary judgment in favor of the defendants in this 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 civil rights action. The district court determined that the Damjanovics had not presented evidence of an official policy sufficient to confer liability on the County of Los Angeles, and that Block was not a final policymaker for the County. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and review de novo. Hopkins v. Andaya, 958 F.2d 881, 884 (9th Cir.1992). We…