Young

Young v. United States

Good Law
24 F.2d 640·1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 2125
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 1928No. 5323California1,147 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Dietrich, J.

By the indictment, Robert L. Young and nine others were charged with a conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA). Some of the defendants pleaded guilty, and upon trial the others were convicted. Young alone brings error and his one contention is the insufficiency of the evidence to connect him with the conspiracy, the existence of which is not questioned.

As alleged, the conspiracy was formed on or about September 1, 1926, and continued up to April 4, 1927, on which latter date a raid was made on what is referred to as the Abernathy Place, a few miles from Portland, Or., resulting in the seizure of a 400-gallon still, 4,000 gallons of mash, 23 gallons of whisky together with other properties, and the immediate arrest of some of the defendants. Young had, for about fifteen months prior thereto, been employed as the manager of one of the stores of the Pacific Supply Company, a wholesale and retail house in Portland, handling barrels, kegs, jugs, sugar, malt, syrups, pressure tanks, and other supplies more or less commonly used in the illicit liquor business. He was well acquainted with his codefendant, Roy Solem, who was the manager of a yeast company, having its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.